Turkish Journal of Rheumatology - 2001; 16(3)
http://romatizma.dergisi.org
Turkish Journal of Rheumatology - RSS feed of 2001; 16(3)1307-9034June 2001Turkish Journal of Rheumatology1307-9034
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=127
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161302001-06-01125Original Article
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=128
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161372001-06-01131Original Article
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=129
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161422001-06-01138Original Article
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=130
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161482001-06-01143Original Article
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=131
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161532001-06-01149Original Article
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=132
2 . Oswestry disability index was calculated for the patients.
Patients' and controls' body mass index were also calculated. Patients'
cross-sectional area of paraspinal muscles were significantly smaller than that
of controls. Cross-sectional area of paraspinal muscle in male patients were
significantly greater than that of female patients. There was a significant and
negative correlation (r: - 0.367 p: 0.009) between crosssectional area of
paraspinal muscles and functional restriction score in the patients group.]]>2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161582001-06-01154Original Article
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=133
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161632001-06-01159Case Report
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=134
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161682001-06-01164Case Report
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=135
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161762001-06-01169Review
http://romatizma.dergisi.org/text.php3?id=136
2001-06-01Turkish Journal of Rheumatology3161862001-06-01177Review